Affiliate Disclosure: This post may contain affiliate links – I may receive a small commission if you purchase through links, at no extra cost to you. Read HERE.
This decision has sparked concerns about the impact on the Kenyan economy, especially in terms of taxation and government revenue. The freeze raises essential questions about how Kenya will compensate for the loss of financial inflows and whether new tax measures will be introduced to bridge the gap.
How USAID Affects Kenya’s Economy
For years, USAID has been a significant source of foreign exchange reserves for Kenya. These reserves help stabilize the shilling against the US dollar, ensuring economic predictability. USAID funds have historically played a role in financing development projects, supporting healthcare initiatives, and facilitating trade relations. The halt in USAID funding raises questions about whether Kenya can maintain its economic stability without this crucial support.
Foreign aid from the United States has also allowed Kenya to fund essential infrastructure projects, improve governance structures, and strengthen disaster response efforts. The freeze means that Kenya must now look inward for alternative funding sources, putting pressure on domestic and foreign tax revenue collection.
The Stability of the Kenya Shilling
Despite the USAID freeze, the Central Bank of Kenya (CBK) reassures the public that the country’s foreign currency reserves remain stable. According to CBK Governor Kamau Thugge, the reserves increased from $8.87 billion in January 2024 to $9.21 billion in February 2025, largely due to substantial diaspora remittances. The Kenya shilling has also remained stable against the US dollar, averaging KSh 129.19 since the aid freeze.
Although the shilling has remained stable for now, concerns remain about the long-term effects of reduced foreign exchange inflows. If international trade slows down due to weaker financial backing from USAID-related projects, businesses might struggle to secure foreign currency, leading to increased demand for the dollar. This could trigger inflation and necessitate tax hikes to offset potential economic downturns.
The Tax Implications of the USAID Freeze
1. Reduced Foreign Exchange Reserves and Import Taxes
USAID funding contributes to Kenya’s foreign exchange reserves. With this source of dollars drying up, Kenya might struggle to maintain an affordable exchange rate. A weaker shilling could mean higher costs for imported goods, leading to increased import taxes and tariffs. As a result, businesses may face higher costs, which could trickle down to consumers in the form of higher prices for essential services and goods.
2. Pressure on Tax Revenue Collection
The government may need to find alternative revenue sources to replace lost USAID funding. This could lead to increased taxation, such as higher VAT, excise duties, or income taxes, to sustain government programs previously supported by USAID. Additionally, corporate taxes may be revised to target multinational companies and high-earning businesses, ensuring that Kenya remains financially self-sufficient.
3. Impact on Development Projects and Local Taxation
USAID supports many projects in Kenya, from infrastructure to healthcare. With funding cuts, the government may turn to local taxation to fill the financial gap, leading to higher levies on businesses and individuals. This could include property taxes, service fees, and increased tax compliance enforcement to maximize collections.
4. Diaspora Remittances as a Tax Cushion
One bright spot in Kenya’s economy is the rise in diaspora remittances. In 2024, Kenya received $4.94 billion in remittances, which is now the country’s largest source of foreign exchange. While this helps stabilize the economy, it does not directly replace the tax benefits and development funding USAID previously provided. The government may explore taxation on remittance transactions as a means to generate additional revenue, though such a move could be controversial.
What Could Further Affect the Kenya Shilling?
While Kenya has managed to maintain a stable currency despite the USAID freeze, certain external factors could still create economic pressure:
a. A decline in diaspora remittances: If fewer Kenyans abroad send money home, the government might need to raise taxes to compensate.
b. Increased global oil prices: Higher oil prices could weaken the shilling, leading to inflation and potential tax adjustments.
c. Reduced foreign investments: With less USAID support, Kenya might appear riskier to foreign investors, leading to capital outflows and increased borrowing costs.
d. Political instability: If concerns over economic sustainability grow, investors may hesitate to inject capital into Kenyan markets, weakening financial confidence.
The Government’s Response to the USAID Freeze
President William Ruto’s administration has emphasized the importance of growing diaspora remittances and expanding local revenue collection. The government aims to fill the financial gap left by USAID’s withdrawal by promoting investments from the Kenyan diaspora and boosting domestic tax compliance.
Additionally, the government may explore new tax measures, such as digital service taxes and corporate taxation on multinational firms operating in Kenya.
Several initiatives have been proposed to counteract the effects of the USAID freeze, including:
a. Encouraging foreign direct investment (FDI): Kenya is actively seeking partnerships with new international investors to reduce dependency on US aid.
b. Enhancing trade agreements: The government is negotiating new trade deals that could provide financial and economic stability.
c. Promoting tax reforms: Strategies to improve tax compliance and close loopholes in revenue collection are under consideration.
Related Articles
Final Thoughts
The USAID funding freeze under Trump’s orders has raised concerns about Kenya’s economic future, particularly regarding tax policies and revenue generation. While substantial diaspora remittances and existing foreign reserves have kept the Kenya shilling stable, the government may need to adjust tax policies to sustain key projects and services.
Moving forward, Kenya must find innovative ways to balance its tax structure and economic stability without relying on foreign aid. Expanding domestic tax collection efforts, securing new trade agreements, and enhancing remittance contributions will be crucial in maintaining financial stability in the post-USAID era.
